“Apostolic
origin” was important because the apostles were the actual eye witnesses to the
life, death and resurrection of Christ. The Apostles knew Jesus well. They were with him. They participated in his ministry. They sat at Jesus’ feet and learned from him. Most importantly, however, they witnessed the
events of Holy Week and Easter. The
Apostles and the first century communities that formed around them through the
prompting and inspiration of the Holy Spirit went on to write down their
experience of Jesus. These writings were
written down, or “codified,” into what we know today as the New Testament Canon
of Scripture.
The
church generally used three criteria for finally deciding if a book should be
included in the Canon of Scripture:
1.
That it was
written by an Apostle or by the community that immediately formed around an
Apostle.
2.
That it had been
circulated among the apostolic churches in the Mediterranean basin and was
widely, if not universally, accepted.
3.
That the writing
was consistent with the larger body of writings accepted in the church.
By about 140 AD, the four Gospels and most of the Pauline Epistles were accepted by the broader Church. By the end of the 2nd Century, the accepted books also included 1 Peter, 1 John, Jude and Revelation. Books still being questioned by the Church, primarily based on the possibly of non-apostolic origins, were Hebrews, James, 2 Peter, 2 John, 3 John, Shepherd of Hermas and the Revelation of Peter. Five of these seven books were eventually accepted, giving us our present day New Testament.
No comments:
Post a Comment